PRIVACY SPECIAL: Where are the African Snowdens?

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Edward Snowden is a former CIA employee and NSA contractor who disclosed about 200,000 classified documents to the press. The documents contains details about how the United States are illegally spying on their own citizens, spying on foreign leaders (for example listening to German Chancellor mobile phone calls), and spying on foreign companies, etc.

Snowden’s revelations have helped build awareness about the danger of the pervasive surveillance system the USA has dropped over all the citizens of the world. “Bringing light to dark corners” was the mission Snowden accomplished, and because of his courage things have started changing.

United States secretary of state John Kerry admitted that the NSA had gone “too far” and promised that it would be stopped. (Unfortunately, I don’t know if there is anyone left on this earth who trust the words of an American politician?!)

Why do we need African Snowdens?

Because we need to fight corruption and kill the current kleptocratic african aristocracy that’s blocking the renaissance of the continent.

Last month, a Ghanian minister called Victoria Hammah was sacked from office, after her courageous driver secretly recorded her, over 90 days, speaking about the corruption schemes inside the country top administration, and above all she was saying she will not quit politics until she makes at least one million dollars.

Three years ago, Wikileaks released US diplomatic cables depicting in sickening details how Shell, the Anglo-Dutch oil giant, has deployed a powerful grip on Nigerian politics with planted staff in all the main ministries of the Federal Government of Nigeria, spying for them in every government department.

As redacted by WsWs, “One cable recounts the visit to the embassy by Shell’s executive vice-president for Africa, Ann Pickard, on October 13, 2009, for a meeting with US ambassador Robin Sanders, to discuss the status of the Petroleum Industry Bill then being considered by the Nigerian national assembly. The bill would legalise international joint ventures, further opening the nominally state-owned oil industry to foreign capital.

Pickard discussed the company’s strategy for manipulating the legislature, warning that the Nigerian Senate “will pass a bad bill,” but adding, “we aren’t worried,” although “we need to move quickly.” The company expected to have its way in the lower house, she explained: “We are working with the House and the House appears to want to work with us.”

Asked by Sanders if the industry was united in its approach—i.e., if US-owned companies had differences with Shell, which is British-Dutch owned—Pickard replied that there was “total alignment with the international oil companies at every level.” The ambassador told her that the US, British, Dutch and French embassies had made a joint call on the managing director of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, Dr. Mohammed Barkindo, in support of the plan for joint ventures.

Pickard then told the ambassador about China’s new interest in bidding on oil blocks in Nigeria, explaining that “Shell had received a copy of the letter that special advisor to the president on Petroleum Matters Dr. Emmanuel Egbogah had sent to the Chinese which said that their offer for oil exploration blocks was not good enough.”

Shell had “good sources” on Nigeria’s talks with both China and Russia, because the government of Nigeria “had forgotten that Shell had seconded people to all the relevant ministries and that Shell consequently had access to everything that was being done in those ministries.”

This discussion demonstrates the real relationship between the nominally independent country and the multinational oil company, whose annual gross revenues are comparable to Nigeria’s GDP. The country is sovereign in name only, while Shell, in partnership with other oil giants and US and British imperialism, has the final say on all key decisions.

The discussions between Pickard and the US ambassador went well beyond immediate oil interests. They discussed internal Nigerian politics, including the most recent amnesty offer by the central government to separatist militants in the Niger Delta, the main oil-producing region. Pickard said the situation would remain quiet until the end of the year, but would get “out-of-hand” when state elections began in the New Year.

According to the cable, “She expressed particular concern about Bayelsa State, home to Shell’s 500,000 barrel-per-day capacity Bonny field.” She said that Israeli security experts had been deployed in Bayelsa state, but not in the Delta, and there had been “a big drop in kidnapping” as a result.

At an earlier meeting, on September 18, 2008, Pickard discussed with a US embassy official the aftermath of a violent attack on a Shell facility. According to the cable sent by consul-general Donna Blair, Pickard asked what the US government knew about any interest in Nigeria on the part of the Russian oil monopoly Gazprom, as well the possible shipment of surface-to-air missiles to militant groups in the Niger Delta.

The oil company executive and the embassy official engaged in a detailed discussion of the new military tactics employed by the militants, who attacked from the land rather than from the water, as in previous incidents, and also the political response by the Nigerian authorities. Pickard complained that the Rivers State governor “lacked the connections among Rivers State militant leaders to successfully co-opt them as the governors in Delta and Bayelsa states have done with militants in their states.”

In relation to Gazprom, Pickard said that “contacts in the British government” had told her that Nigeria had promised the Russian company “access to 17 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.” This would require taking concessions currently assigned to other companies, and she assumed Shell would be the “prime target.”

The Shell vice president also told the US consul that the oil company had “intelligence” about the shipment of surface-to-air missiles, but was unsure of its reliability. The cable continues: “When asked what aviation security steps Shell was taking, Pickard said Shell helicopters generally fly above the effective range of the small and medium caliber weapons used by militants.”

At another meeting on January 27, 2009, Pickard complained about the level of corruption in the Nigerian government, saying that oil buyers had to pay large bribes to the managing director of the NNPC, the government’s chief economic adviser and even the first lady, Turai Yar’Adua. “Pickard also reported an instance of the attorney general Aondoakaa allegedly soliciting a $20 million bribe to sign a document,” the cable reads.

The immediate reason for this visit was an attack by militants on a tanker loading at the Shell platform in Bonny, the 15th such attack on an oil company in the first month of 2009, part of a general breakdown of security in the country.

According to the cable, “The ambassador asked what Shell’s thoughts were on any potential for a coup. Pickard answered that there is little intellectual capital to plan and execute a coup and Shell sees little potential for one.”

The two then discussed the precarious state of health of president Yar’Adua. He was to die the next year, and has been succeeded by vice president Goodluck Jonathan.

Another embassy cable notes unconfirmed reports of bribery, smuggling and other forms of corruption linked to Yar’Adua’s wife, who had purchased a $10 million house in central London. One contact told embassy officials that while Yar’Adua was not taking bribes himself, “his wife siphoned off millions in public funds for private use.”

The cable reported an interview with a Yar’Adua crony, Dahiru Mangal, who had just been named a special adviser to the president. According to the cable, “Yar’Adua instructed Mangal to cease any illicit activity if Mangal wished to enjoy official recognition by the President. The contact implied this may connote, inter alia, that Yar’Adua desires to maintain at least the appearance of respect for rule of law, and thus, does not want any of his close advisors openly involved in suspect activity.”

The most recent cable from Nigeria released by WikiLeaks describes a meeting February 26, 2010 between ambassador Sanders and Goodluck Jonathan, then the acting president. The meeting was triggered by the sudden and unexpected return of Yar’Adua to Nigeria from Saudi Arabia, where he had been near death at a medical facility.

Jonathan gave the US representative a complete account of his political plans to force Yar’Adua’s resignation, become interim president, dissolve the cabinet and hold new elections. He described his consultations with former presidents and military rulers over how to convince Yar’Adua to step down.

The ambassador encouraged the acting president to go ahead with these plans despite the danger of regional tensions or a north-south split within the country’s ruling elite, since Yar’Adua, a northerner, would be replaced by a southerner, Jonathan.

The acting president then agreed to allow the United States and Britain to provide “technical assistance” for the proposed election in 2011—in other words, the transition would be supervised by the former colonial master and the new neo-colonial boss.

To underscore the actual power relationship, Ambassador Sanders demanded assurances that the current head of the election commission would be removed, and Jonathan pledged to “have him out as soon as next month.”

Overall, the cables from Nigeria give a picture of the relations between Shell, the US embassy and the Nigerian government that could hardly be done justice by a John LeCarré novel or a Hollywood spy film.”

Now, more than ever, We need more courageous young and old Africans doing the job Wikileaks and Snowden are doing.

  • If you have access to the colonial contracts, and secret pacts that are ruining the continent, make copies and release them to the press!
  • If you know some politicians who are engaging in criminal activities, record them, steal documents that could be used to indict them!
  • If you know some companies engaging in criminal and unethical activities, steal documents, bug and record the top managers, and make all documents public!
  • If your are working for some NGOs, or public organisations which are engaging in criminal and unethical behaviours, record or grab anything that could help unmask them!
  • If you know some journalists which are employed by criminal organisations or colonial organisations, make sure the world know about them. Record them, bug them and release the tapes.
  • If you belong to a secret society, an alumni network, a Freemasons lodge which are engaging in criminal behaviors, secretly record the people engaging in those activities and expose them.

Be careful, but don’t be afraid. Freedom has a price to be paid. The continent liberation will bear sacrifice. You can’t just sit and complain.

This post was originally written for Silicon Africa, by its editor Mawuna Koutonin. Koutonin is a world peace activist who relentlessly works to empower people to express their full potential and pursue their dreams, regardless of their background. Koutonin is in Johannesburg tonight and will be speaking on the subject of African whistleblowers at this Hacks/Hackers event.



Hypertext creates relevant business and consumer technology content for our readers. We live at the crossroads of invention, culture, mobile, 3D printing and more, where the greatest ideas of today inspire the innovations of tomorrow.


[mailpoet_form id="1"]